Personality Structure
5-factors
Origins
Debates
- Costa & McCrae (1992a) [5] pdf
- Eysenck (1992) [8] pdf
- Costa & McCrae (1992b) [6] pdf
- Block (1995) [2]
- Costa & McCrae (1995) [4]
- Goldberg & Saucier (1995) [9]
- Other models
6-factor model HEXACO
- Ashton & Lee (2007) [1]
- Brocklebank, Pauls, Rockmore & Bates (2015) [http://differentialclub.wikidot.com/local--files/personality-structure/Brocklebank%202015%20hexaco.pdf pdf
| Facet | Code | H–H | N | E | A | C | O |
| Anxiety | N1 | 9 | 1 | ||||
| Anger | N2 | 10 | |||||
| Depression | N3 | 9 | 1 | ||||
| Self-Consciousness | N4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | |||
| Immoderation | N5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Vulnerability | N6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Friendliness | E1 | 8 | 2 | ||||
| Gregariousness | E2 | 10 | |||||
| Assertiveness | E3 | 6 | 4 | ||||
| Activity Level | E4 | 10 | |||||
| Excitement-Seeking | E5 | 10 | |||||
| Cheerfulness | E6 | 1 | 5 | 4 | |||
| Imagination | O1 | 10 | |||||
| Artistic Interests | O2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Emotionality | O3 | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Adventurousness | O4 | 1 | 9 | ||||
| Intellect | O5 | 10 | |||||
| Liberalism | O6 | 10 | |||||
| Trust | A1 | 1 | 9 | ||||
| Morality | A2 | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Altruism | A3 | 10 | |||||
| Cooperation | A4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Modesty | A5 | 10 | |||||
| Sympathy | A6 | 10 | |||||
| Self-Efficacy | C1 | 1 | 9 | ||||
| Orderliness | C2 | 10 | |||||
| Dutifulness | C3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Achievement-Striving | C4 | 10 | |||||
| Self-Discipline | C5 | 10 | |||||
| Cautiousness | C6 | 8 | 2 |
Bibliography
1. Ashton, M. C. and Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and social psychology review, 11. 150-166. doi. PMID.
2. Block, J. (1995). Going beyond the five factors given: Rejoinder to Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 117. 221-225. doi]. PMID].
3. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M. and Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50. 975-990. doi. PMID.
4. Costa, P. T., Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1995). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117. 216-220.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality & Individual Differences, 13. 653-665. doi
6. Costa, P. T., Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). "Four ways five factors are not basic": Reply. Personality & Individual Differences, 13. 861-865. doi.
7. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41. 417-440. doi.
8. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13. 667-673. doi.
9. Goldberg, L. R. and Saucier, G. (1995). So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117. 221-225. doi]. PMID].
10. Goldberg, L. R. (1995). What the hell took so long? Donald W. Fiske and the Big-Five factor structure. In ''Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske.'' P. E. Shrout, S. T. Fiske and et al., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 29-43.
11. McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57. 17-40. doi]. PMID].
page revision: 15, last edited: 18 Jul 2015 16:45